BroadcastReceiver vs WakefulBroadcast Receiver

2022-08-31 15:37:25

有人可以解释 BroadcastReceiverWakefulBroadcastReceiver 之间的确切区别吗?

在什么情况下我们必须使用每个 Receiver 类?


答案 1

和 之间只有一个区别。BroadcastReceiverWakefulBroadcastReceiver

当您收到内部方法的广播时,onReceive()

假设

广播接收者

  • 不能保证CPU将保持唤醒,如果你启动一些长时间运行的进程。CPU 可能会立即恢复睡眠状态。

WakefulBroadcast接收者

  • 可以保证CPU将保持唤醒状态,直到您开火 。completeWakefulIntent

例:

在这里,当您收到广播时,您正在启动一项服务,就像您正在使用的那样,它将保持并且不会让CPU进入睡眠状态,直到您完成服务内部的工作并启动WakefulBroadcastReceiverwakelockcompleteWakefulIntent

法典:

public class SimpleWakefulReceiver extends WakefulBroadcastReceiver {
    @Override
    public void onReceive(Context context, Intent intent) {
        // This is the Intent to deliver to our service.
        Intent service = new Intent(context, SimpleWakefulService.class);

        // Start the service, keeping the device awake while it is launching.
        Log.i("SimpleWakefulReceiver", "Starting service @ " + SystemClock.elapsedRealtime());
        startWakefulService(context, service);
    }
}

class SimpleWakefulService extends IntentService {
    public SimpleWakefulService() {
        super("SimpleWakefulService");
    }

    @Override
    protected void onHandleIntent(Intent intent) {
        // At this point SimpleWakefulReceiver is still holding a wake lock
        // for us.  We can do whatever we need to here and then tell it that
        // it can release the wakelock.  This sample just does some slow work,
        // but more complicated implementations could take their own wake
        // lock here before releasing the receiver's.
        //
        // Note that when using this approach you should be aware that if your
        // service gets killed and restarted while in the middle of such work
        // (so the Intent gets re-delivered to perform the work again), it will
        // at that point no longer be holding a wake lock since we are depending
        // on SimpleWakefulReceiver to that for us.  If this is a concern, you can
        // acquire a separate wake lock here.
        for (int i=0; i<5; i++) {
            Log.i("SimpleWakefulReceiver", "Running service " + (i+1)
                    + "/5 @ " + SystemClock.elapsedRealtime());
            try {
                Thread.sleep(5000);
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            }
        }
        Log.i("SimpleWakefulReceiver", "Completed service @ " + SystemClock.elapsedRealtime());
        SimpleWakefulReceiver.completeWakefulIntent(intent);
    }
}

答案 2

推荐