为什么在 Java 11 中，对于空白字符串，String.strip（） 比 String.trim（） 快 5 倍
2022-09-03 05:18:51
我遇到了一个有趣的场景。由于某种原因，针对空白字符串（仅包含空格）的速度明显快于Java 11。strip()trim()
基准
public class Test {
public static final String TEST_STRING = " "; // 3 whitespaces
@Benchmark
@Warmup(iterations = 10, time = 200, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 500, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.Throughput)
public void testTrim() {
TEST_STRING.trim();
}
@Benchmark
@Warmup(iterations = 10, time = 200, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 500, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.Throughput)
public void testStrip() {
TEST_STRING.strip();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(args);
}
}
结果
# Run complete. Total time: 00:04:16
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Test.testStrip thrpt 200 2067457963.295 ± 12353310.918 ops/s
Test.testTrim thrpt 200 402307182.894 ± 4559641.554 ops/s
显然表现优于约5倍。strip()trim()
尽管对于非空字符串，结果几乎相同：
public class Test {
public static final String TEST_STRING = " Test String ";
@Benchmark
@Warmup(iterations = 10, time = 200, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 500, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.Throughput)
public void testTrim() {
TEST_STRING.trim();
}
@Benchmark
@Warmup(iterations = 10, time = 200, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@Measurement(iterations = 20, time = 500, timeUnit = MILLISECONDS)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.Throughput)
public void testStrip() {
TEST_STRING.strip();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(args);
}
}
# Run complete. Total time: 00:04:16
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Test.testStrip thrpt 200 126939018.461 ± 1462665.695 ops/s
Test.testTrim thrpt 200 141868439.680 ± 1243136.707 ops/s
怎么会这样？这是一个错误还是我做错了？
测试环境
- CPU - 英特尔至强 E3-1585L v5 @3.00 GHz
- 操作系统 - 视窗 7 SP 1 64 位
- JVM - Oracle JDK 11.0.1
- 本查姆克 - JMH v 1.19
更新
为不同的字符串（空、空等）添加了更多性能测试。
基准
@Warmup(iterations = 5, time = 1, timeUnit = SECONDS)
@Measurement(iterations = 5, time = 1, timeUnit = SECONDS)
@Fork(value = 3)
@BenchmarkMode(Mode.Throughput)
public class Test {
private static final String BLANK = ""; // Blank
private static final String EMPTY = " "; // 3 spaces
private static final String ASCII = " abc "; // ASCII characters only
private static final String UNICODE = " абв "; // Russian Characters
private static final String BIG = EMPTY.concat("Test".repeat(100)).concat(EMPTY);
@Benchmark
public void blankTrim() {
BLANK.trim();
}
@Benchmark
public void blankStrip() {
BLANK.strip();
}
@Benchmark
public void emptyTrim() {
EMPTY.trim();
}
@Benchmark
public void emptyStrip() {
EMPTY.strip();
}
@Benchmark
public void asciiTrim() {
ASCII.trim();
}
@Benchmark
public void asciiStrip() {
ASCII.strip();
}
@Benchmark
public void unicodeTrim() {
UNICODE.trim();
}
@Benchmark
public void unicodeStrip() {
UNICODE.strip();
}
@Benchmark
public void bigTrim() {
BIG.trim();
}
@Benchmark
public void bigStrip() {
BIG.strip();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
org.openjdk.jmh.Main.main(args);
}
}
结果
# Run complete. Total time: 00:05:23
Benchmark Mode Cnt Score Error Units
Test.asciiStrip thrpt 15 356846913.133 ± 4096617.178 ops/s
Test.asciiTrim thrpt 15 371319467.629 ± 4396583.099 ops/s
Test.bigStrip thrpt 15 29058105.304 ± 1909323.104 ops/s
Test.bigTrim thrpt 15 28529199.298 ± 1794655.012 ops/s
Test.blankStrip thrpt 15 1556405453.206 ± 67230630.036 ops/s
Test.blankTrim thrpt 15 1587932109.069 ± 19457780.528 ops/s
Test.emptyStrip thrpt 15 2126290275.733 ± 23402906.719 ops/s
Test.emptyTrim thrpt 15 406354680.805 ± 14359067.902 ops/s
Test.unicodeStrip thrpt 15 37320438.099 ± 399421.799 ops/s
Test.unicodeTrim thrpt 15 88226653.577 ± 1628179.578 ops/s
测试环境是相同的。
只有一个有趣的发现。包含 Unicode 字符的字符串，其“ed”速度比“ed快”trim()strip()
