即使具有 orphanRemoval=true,孤儿也会保留在数据库中,在一对多关系 (JPA/Hibernate) 上也是如此

2022-09-04 21:31:45
@Entity
@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.SINGLE_TABLE)
@Table(name = "company_policies")
@DiscriminatorColumn(name = "rule_name")
public abstract class AbstractPolicyRule implements Serializable {

  @Transient
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

  @Id
  @GeneratedValue
  private Long id;
  private String value;

  ...
}

_

@Entity
public class Category implements Serializable {

  @Transient
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

  @Id
  @GeneratedValue
  private Long id;
  @Column(name = "category_name")
  private String name;

  @OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade = { CascadeType.ALL }, orphanRemoval = true)
  @JoinColumn(name = "category_policy_id", referencedColumnName = "id")
  private Set<AbstractPolicyRule> activePolicyRules;

  ...
}

更新此集时,现有的 activePolicyRules 在数据库中将其category_policy_id设置为 null,并插入新的策略。我想删除原始的。

我以为添加 orphanRemoval = true 会这样做,但事实并非如此。我看到的其他问题似乎具有双向关系,并且将父项设置为 null 可以解决它,但这不是双向关系。

有什么建议吗?

使用休眠 3.5.3

编辑:仅当数据库中存在现有的 AbstractPolicyRule 时,才会发生这种情况,我将其从列表中删除,然后再次保存类别。它的外键(category_policy_id)设置为 null,而不是被删除。

[DEBUG] Collection found: [domain.category.Category.activePolicyRules#1], was: 
[<unreferenced>] (initialized)
[DEBUG] Flushed: 0 insertions, 2 updates, 0 deletions to 2 objects
[DEBUG] Flushed: 1 (re)creations, 0 updates, 1 removals to 1 collections
...
[DEBUG] Deleting collection: [domain.category.Category2.activePolicyRules#1]
[DEBUG] about to open PreparedStatement (open PreparedStatements: 0, globally: 0)
[DEBUG] update company_policies set category_policy_id=null where category_policy_id=?
[DEBUG] done deleting collection

还尝试了联接表,因为Hibernate文档不鼓励使用上述方式:

@Entity
public class Category implements Serializable {

  @Transient
  private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;

  @Id
  @GeneratedValue
  private Long id;
  @Column(name = "category_name")
  private String name;

  @OneToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade = { CascadeType.ALL }, orphanRemoval = true)
  @JoinTable(name = "policy_rule_mapping", 
    joinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "category_id"), 
    inverseJoinColumns = @JoinColumn(name = "rule_id"))
  private Set<AbstractPolicyRule> activePolicyRules;

  ...
}

这有同样的问题。映射表中的行将被删除,但抽象策略规则仍包含已删除的项。


答案 1

我正在使用单向一对多关联,没有任何问题。orphanRemoval=true

实际上,我测试了您的代码和以下场景(实现/正确):AbstractPolicyRuleequalshashCode

Category category = new Category();
AbstractPolicyRule policyRule1 = new AbstractPolicyRule("foo");

category.addToActivePolicyRules(policyRule1);
em.persist(category);
em.flush();

assertNotNull(category.getId());
assertNotNull(category.getActivePolicyRules());
assertEquals(1, category.getActivePolicyRules().size());

category.removeFromActivePolicyRules(policyRule1);
category.addToActivePolicyRules(new AbstractPolicyRule("bar"));
// category = em.merge(category); // works with or without
em.flush();
assertEquals(1, category.getActivePolicyRules().size());

只是按预期工作。在生成的跟踪下方:

22:54:30.817 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - insert into Category (id, category_name) values (null, ?)
Hibernate: insert into Category (id, category_name) values (null, ?)
22:54:30.824 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.StringType - binding null to parameter: 1
22:54:30.844 [main] DEBUG o.h.id.IdentifierGeneratorHelper - Natively generated identity: 1
...
22:54:30.872 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - insert into AbstractPolicyRule (id, name) values (null, ?)
Hibernate: insert into AbstractPolicyRule (id, name) values (null, ?)
22:54:30.873 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.StringType - binding 'foo' to parameter: 1
22:54:30.874 [main] DEBUG o.h.id.IdentifierGeneratorHelper - Natively generated identity: 1
...
22:54:30.924 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - update AbstractPolicyRule set category_policy_id=? where id=?
Hibernate: update AbstractPolicyRule set category_policy_id=? where id=?
22:54:30.927 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '1' to parameter: 1
22:54:30.928 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '1' to parameter: 2
22:54:30.929 [main] DEBUG o.h.p.c.AbstractCollectionPersister - done inserting collection: 1 rows inserted
22:54:30.929 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher - Executing batch size: 1
...
22:54:30.945 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - insert into AbstractPolicyRule (id, name) values (null, ?)
Hibernate: insert into AbstractPolicyRule (id, name) values (null, ?)
22:54:30.948 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.StringType - binding 'bar' to parameter: 1
22:54:30.948 [main] DEBUG o.h.id.IdentifierGeneratorHelper - Natively generated identity: 2
...
22:54:30.990 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - update AbstractPolicyRule set category_policy_id=null where category_policy_id=? and id=?
Hibernate: update AbstractPolicyRule set category_policy_id=null where category_policy_id=? and id=?
22:54:30.991 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '1' to parameter: 1
22:54:30.992 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '1' to parameter: 2
22:54:30.993 [main] DEBUG o.h.p.c.AbstractCollectionPersister - done deleting collection rows: 1 deleted
22:54:30.993 [main] DEBUG o.h.p.c.AbstractCollectionPersister - Inserting rows of collection: [com.stackoverflow.q3304092.Category.activePolicyRules#1]
22:54:30.994 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.jdbc.AbstractBatcher - Executing batch size: 1
...
22:54:30.996 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - update AbstractPolicyRule set category_policy_id=? where id=?
Hibernate: update AbstractPolicyRule set category_policy_id=? where id=?
22:54:30.997 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '1' to parameter: 1
22:54:30.998 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '2' to parameter: 2
22:54:31.002 [main] DEBUG o.h.p.c.AbstractCollectionPersister - done inserting rows: 1 inserted
...
22:54:31.015 [main] DEBUG org.hibernate.SQL - delete from AbstractPolicyRule where id=?
Hibernate: delete from AbstractPolicyRule where id=?
22:54:31.017 [main] TRACE org.hibernate.type.LongType - binding '1' to parameter: 1

将删除第一个策略规则。

如果这不能代表您正在执行的操作,则可能应该提供更多代码。

更新:正在回答OP的评论...

哇,我刚刚将saveOrUpdate调用更改为合并,现在它正在适当地删除。你有什么见解,为什么会这样?

只是一个猜测:既然是JPA的事情,我想知道是否会适当地处理它(实际上,自从你提到JPA以来,我以为你正在使用API)。orphanRemovalsaveOrUpdateEntityManager


答案 2

首先,请确保您的类实现了 and 方法,以便休眠确切地知道这些项已从集合中删除。hashCode()equals()

然后尝试定义休眠注释,在那里指定删除孤立级联类型,并观察是否发生同样的情况。如果它按照您想要的方式工作 - 在休眠状态中报告错误并暂时使用专有注释。否则 - 使用详细信息更新问题@Cascade


推荐